What Being a Jewish Hero Means

September 1, 2010 · Filed Under Baum's Blog · Comment 

I’ve been nominated as a Jewish Community hero.  This is a lovely honor, but it’s really not all about me.

From now until October 8th, you can vote once every 12 hours by going to www.votebaum.com and clicking “vote.”  If you vote for me, the benefit is that OurJewishCommunity.org will get more attention throughout the country.  This is a wonderful thing.

In addition, if I am in the top 20 nominees (currently, I’m in the 10th spot) at the end of this process, that will make us eligible to receive grant money (decided ultimately by judges on a panel).  This would be a tremendous gift for OurJewishCommunity.org as we rely on donations and grants to help us do the work we are doing.  In addition, I am thrilled to share that two generous donors, Peter and Mary Levin, have indicated that they will match any money raised (including through this grant and other donations we receive) up to $25,000.  If we win the Jewish heroes contest, we win twice as much!

Please show your support by voting and encouraging your friends to vote.

Thanks to the generosity of another donor who gave us a new iPod Touch, we will be raffling that off to encourage people to vote.  To be entered in the raffle (you can be entered multiple times) for the iTouch:

1. Sign up to receive a daily reminder email every day between now and October 8th asking you to vote.  If you sign up before September 21st, we’ll enter you in our raffle.  Sign up at: http://bit.ly/emailhero

2. If you are on Twitter each time you tweet the word “www.votebaum.com” with some positive encouragement for people to vote for Rabbi Baum, we’ll enter you in our raffle.  Remember each day you tweet this between now and October 8th you’ll be entered to win the iTouch.

We appreciate your support of our organization.  Remember: You can vote early and often!

Jewish Weddings in the News

August 30, 2010 · Filed Under Baum's Blog · Comment 

Two articles in the Jewish press really got my attention this week.  And by attention I mean ire.

The first article is by Rabbi Jason Miller and  asks to “Rescind the Ban on Attending Interfaith Weddings.” This is not an article about officiation.  It’s an article about being a guest at someone’s wedding.  Conservative Judaism forbids its rabbis from attending an interfaith wedding ceremony.  I agree with Rabbi Miller that this ban should be lifted.

Intermarriage is a reality and to tell those Jews who marry non-Jews that their rabbi can’t even show up as a guest at their wedding (even if the rabbi is the sister of the groom, for example!) is an excellent way to turn people off from Judaism.  It’s time for the organized Jewish community to stop building walls and to begin opening its doors more widely.

What I find most offensive about this policy of Conservative Judaism is that I imagine that there are many Conservative congregations that are happy to have interfaith families as dues-paying members of their congregations.  This means that the rabbi will not even show up at the wedding of this family – but will then “welcome” them by accepting their cash dues.  This is a disgrace.

If the Conservative movement truly feels that interfaith marriage is such a tragedy that no rabbi can attend, then the Conservative movement should not welcome interfaith families anywhere near its congregations.  At least then they would be consistent in their beliefs and policies – and likely out of business very soon.

The other article, “A Call for Moratorium on Shabbat Weddings” by Rabbi Leon Morris, argues that all rabbis, including Reform rabbis, should not officiate at weddings that fall during Shabbat under any circumstances.  I disagree with Rabbi Morris.  I tell couples that as long as it is “reasonably evening” I will officiate at their wedding on a Saturday night.  I am not going to make them check sunset times or wait to count three stars in the sky before we start the ceremony.

In liberal Judaism, Shabbat takes on new meaning.  We do not follow halacha (traditional Jewish law) – and thus can do all sorts of things that would otherwise be prohibited on Shabbat (use a light switch, drive, spend money, turn on the stove to make dinner).  I’m glad that we can do all of those things and have adapted our Judaism to one in which Shabbat means something different than it did for traditional ancestors in the past.  Many of us value creating sacred time on Shabbat – we may have dinner with family, we may go to services or watching video streaming Shabbat services, we may stay off of Facebook (I’ve not tried that!), we may go to a park and enjoy the beauty of nature.  If we’ve had a busy weekend but are lucky enough to get a day off midweek, we may even mark that day as our “unofficial Shabbat” – the moment in the week when we can take a deep breath.

There are many ways to mark Shabbat.  All of this reflects an evolving Jewish experience.  One that is not overly restrictive but allows people a plethora of opportunities (Shabbat or otherwise) to connect to their Judaism.  Truth is, most American Jews probably do nothing to mark Shabbat.  There are worse things in the world.

It is also interesting to me that many rabbis who won’t perform weddings before the sun has set on Shabbat will hold Shabbat services on Friday evenings long before the sun has set.  I assume the Friday night decision is out of convenience – so why do these rabbis operate differently about their rigid adherence to the law on Saturdays?

The letter of the law says that rabbis don’t officiate at weddings on Shabbat.  My take on the spirit of the law (far more important to me) says that we work with families to create moments that are meaningful to them.  If that means having a wedding ceremony at 6:30 PM before the sun has set, that is fine.  I am thrilled that the couple wants a Jewish ceremony – that they want a rabbi present – that they have found a time that their family and friends can gather in the way that is most meaningful to them.


Videostreaming Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur Live Webcasts

August 29, 2010 · Filed Under Baum's Blog · Comment 

I am so excited that we will be video-streaming all of our Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur services again this year.  In 2008, we first videostreamed our High Holidays.  A lot has changed since then.  Our community is now much bigger and more active – with tens of thousands of online participants from 150+ countries.  You can check out last year’s online Yom Kippur services if you want to see what they are like.

We now videostream on Facebook which means that we encourage talking during services!  You can chat with others who are watching using our Facebook, Twitter, or Livestream chat features.  Of course, if you want to sit by quietly, that is fine too; you can make the video full-screen.

We’ve been streaming Shabbat services as well for almost a year.  Those are more informal.  Our High Holiday services are live from the sanctuary at Congregation Beth Adam.  Times are at the end of this blog post.

For the 2nd consecutive year, we will also videostream an online Yom Kippur Memorial service.  You can read more about it here.  We encourage you to submit photos of deceased family members whom you are remembering during the holidays.

New this year!  We’re thrilled to announce that we’ll be videostreaming a children’s Rosh Hashanah service and a children’s Yom Kippur service at 1:30 PM ET on September 9th and 18th.

This year, we hope to also stream to mobile devices (iPad, iTouch, iPhone, Blackberry, Droid).  While all of the services are archived for viewing anytime on computers, unfortunately the archives are not accessible on mobile devices.  To watch the live streaming services on a mobile device, go to www.mobileJudaism.com during service times.

All of the services will once again use the liturgy written by Congregation Beth Adam.  You can download a PDF if you would like to follow along.  More information is available by clicking here.

This year’s streaming service schedule is:

Streaming Rosh Hashanah Evening and Day Live 8:15 PM ET September 8th and 10:30 AM September 9th
Streaming Yom Kippur Kol Nidrei (Evening) and Day Live 8:15 PM ET September 17th and 10:30 AM September 18th
Yom Kippur Memorial Live 4:00 PM ET September 18th
Streaming Services for Kids 1:30 PM ET September 9th and 18th

Jewish Community should be more Inclusive

August 24, 2010 · Filed Under Baum's Blog · Comment 

I just came across this nice piece called “Checking Boxes and Changing Institutions.” Its writer Naomi Goldberg tells the story of joining the Jewish Federation’s email list in Chicago and needing to indicate whether she was married or single.  In a long-term and committed relationship that happened to be with another woman, Naomi didn’t fit into any of these categories.

Like Naomi, I am deeply bothered by such forms.  Having such check boxes assumes heteronormativity (that people fall into distinct and complementary genders with natural roles in life. It also holds that heterosexuality is the normal sexual orientation, and states that sexual and marital relations are most  fitting between a man and a woman). When synagogue membership forms have a line for the husband and a line for the wife, this sends a message that all couples should include a male and a female – and that being single is somehow less valued.

While the Jewish community often operates in a world that assumes a nuclear family that is white and has a mom and dad and 1.87 children, that is no longer the reality.  What does a typical Jewish family look like?  I have no idea.  But this I know.  It is diverse and beautiful – with singles, single parents, couples with children, couples without children, heterosexuals, homosexuals, blacks, whites, and every color on the spectrum; it may be faced with illness, or divorce, or children with special needs – or any combination.  Imagine if the greater Jewish community created an environment that was safe and meaningful for all of us.  It is time to break down the walls to make it so.

Online Yom Kippur Memorial Service

August 15, 2010 · Filed Under Baum's Blog · Comment 

Last year, there were several meaningful moments during the High Holidays for me.  But perhaps most touching was our online Yom Kippur Memorial service.

We asked everyone who was interested to submit photos of deceased loved ones so that we could all honor them during the High Holidays.  We will be doing the same this year, and we encourage you to consider participating.

Memory is a central part of the High Holidays.  In particular, Yom Kippur afternoon (when there is traditionally a service called yizkor) provides an important time to remember those who are no longer living.   Recognizing that many people have loved ones they would like to honor, we provide the opportunity for you to share their names and photos.  We include them in a slideshow that is part of a memorial service read by me and Rabbi Barr.

The service will go live at 4 PM on Saturday, September 18th and will also be archived for later viewing anytime.
If there is someone special you would like to remember this Yom Kippur by including their photograph in our online memorial service, please submit a photo by email (admin@bethadam.org) or by mail (10001 Loveland-Madeira Rd., Loveland, OH 45140).  Photos need to be received by Monday, September 13.

Please send only one photo for each person you are remembering, and please include his or her name so that we can provide a text caption.  All photos that are mailed to us will be returned if you include your return address.

If you submitted a photo last year, we will not automatically include it this year.  However, if you would like us to use the same photo, simply send an email to admin@bethadam.org indicating that.

This year, you will be able to view the service along with all of our streaming High Holiday service webcasts by going to http://bit.ly/holidayservices.

The archive of last year’s Yom Kippur Memorial service is available for you to view as well.

Part of what was so amazing last year when I watched the service online was seeing that there were hundreds, if not thousands, of others watching with me.  Many who had not submitted photos took the opportunity to type in names of those they were remembering in our Facebook and Twitter chat feeds.  People comforted one another.   Not only was the power of memory strong – so was the power of community.

If you have any questions about the online memorial service, please let me know.  We hope you’ll join us by honoring family members on Yom Kippur afternoon.  May their memories be for a blessing.

My Take on Tisha B’Av

July 25, 2010 · Filed Under Baum's Blog · Comment 

This past week, some Jews observed the holiday of Tisha B’Av.  I didn’t.  On Tisha B’Av some Jews fast as they commemorate the destructions of the Temple in Jerusalem (it was actually destroyed twice, 586 BCE and 70 CE).  Over the years, other events in Jewish history have become associated with Tisha B’Av as well; if you’re interested, Wikipedia seems like as good a source as any for this information.

I recognize the destructions of the Temples in Jerusalem were terrible blows to the Jewish community.  I recognize that the Jewish community has suffered many times.  But, the destruction of the Temples, I have to admit, is a bit hard for me to relate to since it was so long ago and a reflection of such a different period.  And while I do not want to minimize the tragedy of the events, I will also say that I tend to see the destruction of the Temple as an opportunity.  I’m pretty thrilled that Judaism is not still a religion that practices sacrifice!  The destruction allowed the Jewish people to evolve, they moved from having a central base to being a more portable people, and they were able to create a new Judaism that was meaningful to them, through prayer rather than sacrifice.

The only other way that I personally connect to Tisha B’Av is to think about ways that our world is in need of repair today; for sad events are not only in the past but in the present as well.  While listening to a talk on leadership this week (it happened to fall on Tisha B’Av), I heard the following poem.  It affirmed for me that there is something more I want to do than mourn an event from 2,000 years ago.  Instead, I want to do something to help the world today so that generations after will not mourn what we could have prevented.  There are many children in need.

And thus I share this poem by Ina Hughes (1995, William Morrow Publishers):

We pray for children
who sneak popsicles before supper,
who erase holes in math workbooks,
who throw tantrums in grocery stores and pick at their food,
who like ghost stories,
who can never find their shoes.

And we pray for those
who stare at photographers behind barbed wire,
who can’t bound down the street in a pair of new sneakers,
who are born in places we wouldn’t be caught dead,
who never go to the circus
who live in an X-rated world.

We pray for children
who sleep with the dog and bury the goldfish
who bring us sticky kisses and fistfuls of dandelions,
who get visits from the tooth fairy,
who hug us in a hurry and forget their lunch money.

And we pray for those
who never get dessert,
who have no safe blanket to drag behind them,
who watch their parents watch them die,
who can’t find any bread to steal,
who don’t have any rooms to clean up,
whose pictures aren’t on anybody’s dresser,
whose monsters are real.

We pray for children
who spend all their allowance before Tuesday,
who shove dirty clothes under the bed,
and never rinse out the tub,
who don’t like to be kissed in front of the carpool,
who squirm in church or temple and scream in the phone,
whose tears we sometimes laugh at and
whose smiles can make us cry.

And we pray for those
whose nightmares come in the daytime,
who will eat anything,
who have never seen a dentist,
who aren’t spoiled by anybody,
who go to bed hungry and cry themselves to sleep,
who live and move, but have no being.

We pray for children who want to be carried
and for those who must,
for those we never give up on and
for those who don’t get a second chance.
for those we smother…

and for those who will grab the hand of anybody kind enough to offer it.

Anat Hoffman Arrested for Carrying Torah

July 13, 2010 · Filed Under Baum's Blog · 1 Comment 

I recently blogged about a woman in Israel who was attacked by an Orthodox man for wearing tefillin (ritual object that Orthodox Judaism says is only for men).  Last November I blogged about a woman being arrested for wearing a tallit at the Western Wall (again, the Orthodox (and Israeli government) say women should not wear a prayer shawl there).  I am deeply saddened by the fact that I am once again blogging about traditional Judaism’s (and Israel’s) mistreatment of women and disregard for liberal Judaism.

Each month at the beginning of the month (Rosh Chodesh), a group called Women of the Wall meets to pray.  Their website explains their cause:   “Women of the Wall, a group of Israeli women joined by Jewish women from around the world, seeks the right for Jewish women from Israel and around the world to conduct prayer services, read from a Torah scroll while wearing prayer shawls, and sing out loud at the women’s section of the Western Wall– Judaism’s most sacred holy site and the principal symbol of Jewish people-hood and sovereignty.”

An Israeli Supreme Court ruling prohibits women from reading the Torah at the Western Wall.  Of course, I completely disagree with this exclusion of women.  I am a firm believer in total equality.  I also believe strongly in religious tolerance and do not understand why the Orthodox so often limit the ways the rest of us can express our religion.

While I disagree with the Supreme Court’s ruling, I understand it stands.  But, what I don’t understand is why Anat Hoffman was arrested.  She was not reading from the Torah at the Western Wall.  She was merely carrying it to an area where she is allowed to read it.  There is nothing wrong with that.

Two of my colleagues have written powerful first-hand out accounts of the events.  One is by Rabbi Leah Berkowitz and the other is by Rabbi Denise Eger.

I have watched videos of the events multiple times.  The first one below was shot professionally; the second by Rabbi Berkowitz.  The first shows that Anat refused to put the Torah down, even when she got in the police car.  The second shows a horrific moment when one of the women (Nofrat Frankel, the medical student arrested in November for wearing a tallit) is pushed down the stairs, I believe by a police officer.  I have watched each video multiple times, and my feelings of complete anger and sadness only deepen each time I watch.

One of my Twitter followers wrote my yesterday to say she took her 7 year old daughter to the Kotel (Western Wall) last week and her daughter asked why the women’s side was smaller.  I tweeted her back, “I hope your daughter’s daughter won’t have to ask that question.”


The Cost of Being Jewish & Jewish Institutional Survival

July 12, 2010 · Filed Under Baum's Blog · Comment 

Lisa Miller wrote a column last week for Newsweek entitled “The Cost of Being Jewish: How the Recession Affects Religion.” She writes that many Jewish leaders take seriously the question “Why does it cost so much to be Jewish?” and she quotes Jack Wertheimer who wrote that “Sheer institutional survival now preoccupies the heads of Jewish institutions.”

How sad that is.  If heads of Jewish institutions are focusing on institutional survival at the expense of other areas, then my guess is they are not spending enough time thinking about innovation, strong leadership, evolving to meet the changing needs of the Jewish community, and other worthy topics.  In my experience, when Jewish organizations go into survival mode, they merely try to cut costs in certain areas but still try to do everything else the same old way.  And, as we’ve seen many times, if you keep doing what you’ve always done, you’ll likely get the same results you’ve always gotten.

In the case of American Judaism, that means that more than 50% of Jews will choose not to affiliate.  It means that many interfaith families, gays and lesbians, people with physical limitations, Jews of color, and multiracial Jews will feel on the periphery and not fully welcomed into Jewish communities.  It means that many people will struggle to find a Jewish voice and community that makes sense to them in the 21st century.  It also means that many people will not struggle because they won’t bother; instead they’ll seek fulfillment in other areas of their lives.  And that’s why I think Lisa Miller’s conclusion makes sense.  She writes “Wouldn’t the central challenge of American Jewry be to encourage the broadest range of people… to identity as Jews and to raise Jewish kids?  Costly barriers to entry need to be taken away, or, at least, reimagined.”  Right on!  Too often Jewish institutions and leaders like to tell people “they are not Jewish enough” instead of embracing them and welcoming them on a Jewish journey.

There are many Jews who do not walk into synagogues for various reasons including feeling that traditional Judaism doesn’t have a whole lot of meaning to them.  Thus, we need new synagogue and non-synagogue models that will reach Jews where they are.  We need to recognize that a traditional Jewish experience of showing up at a building a few times each year and reciting a bunch of words that one does not understand and/or agree with is a problem for many.  Judaism needs to offer and engage people so that we all become part of its ongoing evolution.  Then we won’t need institutional heads worrying about the cost of maintaining a building – instead we’ll all be involved in a conversation about why we want to proactively grow our Jewish experience.

Synagogue membership remains a sticky issue.  Synagogues need money to survive.  But the dues model is flawed.  As Lisa Miller so accurately points out synagogue membership “is troubling, both outdated as a business model and onerous to families…”  Synagogue membership, according to a 2005 study, cost an average of $1,100 per year, although in many cities it’s two or three times as much.    I am especially concerned that in interfaith families it’s really hard for the non-Jewish partner to understand why we need such high dues, especially when churches operate on an entirely different model.  There’s no easy solution but I do think we need to create alternatives – both to the dues structure and on a broader scale, to synagogue structure.

Lisa Miller’s column ends with a quote from Arnie Eisen, chancellor of the Jewish Theological Seminary in New York, who said “Jews have been around for a long time” and added “We’ll adjust.”  I certainly hope Dr. Eisen is right, but I have my doubts.  And if Jews manage to adjust, my next question is: at what expense?  Not too much, I hope.

What we can learn from Religion, iPhone Apps, and Websites

July 8, 2010 · Filed Under Baum's Blog · Comment 

I tend to read the New York Times online, either on my computer or Blackberry.  This weekend I saw that one of the most blogged articles was “You Say God is Dead?  There’s an App for That.” I was, of course, intrigued for many reasons as the article hit on many of the things I think about every day: technology, religion, discourse, belief and non-belief, and the God debate.

As a rabbi at Congregation Beth Adam, a synagogue that views Judaism from a humanistic perspective, we don’t need an iPhone app to debate whether God exists or not , and we also know that such a debate can become silly.  It’s a particularly useless conversation when one debater means one thing by the word “God” and another means something entirely different by the word “God.”

To quote from Beth Adam’s God concept: “The concept of God has undergone constant modification in Judaism. The God of the Prophets is different from the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; certainly the God of Maimonides is different from them both. It is impossible to examine here the myriad concepts for the term God, for that would take volumes. Every Jewish thinker has suggested an understanding of the term, redefining how God interacts and participates in the affairs of this world. Many feminist theologians are trying to reconcile traditional male interpretations of God and modern feminist thought. There has always been and continues to be great diversity in the Jewish understanding of God.”

And thus the conclusion in our community is: “To be a Jew has never meant that one must accept some predefined concept of God. Each Jew has always had the right to understand the term as he/she determines.”  That works for me and pretty much eliminates the need for an iPhone app with comebacks and rhetorical strategy for the God debate.

The New York Times article does raise another interesting area of focus.  Rev. R. Albert Mohler Jr., president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY says that students have asked him how to deal with non-believers on campus.  It is certainly true that college campuses, which tend to bring together individuals with diverse backgrounds, are often (hopefully!) a place where serious conversations happen and students find themselves both exposed to new ideas and defending (or perhaps changing) their old ideas.

That’s why as a rabbi who oversees youth education, I concern myself with how we arm our students to enter college campuses.  How will they respond to people who are antisemitic?  What will they say when a Jew for Jesus claims to be Jewish?  How will they respond to Christian missionaries who want to convert them to Christianity?  What will they say to an Orthodox Jews who tells them women cannot read from the Torah scroll at services?

These are all areas that we focus on in our Religious School.  For knowing one’s religion and something about other people’s religions and beliefs allows one to enter into a dialog with respect and intellectual honesty – and also allows one to know when it is best to agree to disagree and walk away from the conversation.

Religion changes quickly.

I mentioned earlier that I usually read the news online.  But as I was glancing at Saturday’s hard-copy of the Times, I saw that the article just under the one about religion and iPhone apps was about the religious website, Beliefnet.  (I later realized the article was written by Mark Oppenheimer, who taught my Saturday morning debate class when I was in high school and he was at Yale.  Small world!).  Beliefnet.com has “survived since 1999 by nurturing every aspect of our conflicted spirituality” and was recently purchased by a company run by evangelical Christians.  While the website was originally focused on journalism and theological conversations it has turned into a community where many were not even seeking religion.  Oppenheimer writes “they wanted spiritual diet advice, depression curatives, tips on the best organic cleaning products.”  In fact, the site has kept separate overtly religious content from other parts of the site to appease advertisers.

Seeing these two articles together further confirmed what I already knew.

Religion is diverse.  Some people feel so strongly about defending their side that they need an iPhone app to help them.  While I certainly value resources including technological tools, I also hope we educate a generation of young people to think for themselves.  I would imagine that fundamentalists can benefit from iPhone apps that arm them with the proper response in a debate – since for them there is no gray, but rather only black and white.  But for those of us who take a liberal perspective on our religion, there is much more nuance and need for understanding.

Religion moves quickly.  Everyone has different needs (spiritual diet advice, online prayer circles, and intellectually honest theological conversations, to name just a few) – and hopefully we can each find our own place.

Fourth of July, Social Media Day, and Gay Pride

July 3, 2010 · Filed Under Baum's Blog · Comment 

Happy Fourth of July weekend (to our readers in the US)!  I hope you all have a safe and wonderful holiday weekend.  In our streaming Shabbat service this week, Rabbi Barr and I talked about the Fourth of July and more broadly about religion in America.  You can watch the archive which is looping all week, or click “more videos” on that page to pull up the 7/2/10 Shabbat service.

It actually feels like a week of celebrating.  June 30 was the first Social Media Day, organized by Mashable.  We at OurJewishCommunity.org think social media is a wonderful thing to celebrate since we’re using social media to create a whole new Jewish experience.  Did any of you celebrate?  Perhaps we should consider writing some new liturgy for it next year!

Last weekend we also celebrated Gay Pride.  I led Shabbat services at Beth Adam and the topic of discussion was Judaism and sexuality.   It was pretty amazing to review how parts of the Jewish community have come a long way with regard to accepting gays, but there is still much progress to be made.  The Reform movement has made public statements toward inclusion several times, but as HUC rabbinic student Molly Kane noted in a powerful recent sermon, complete acceptance, welcoming, and “liberation” are still a dream.

Conservative Judaism has really struggled with homosexuality in the past, and in 2006 the Conservative movement accepted responsa that say opposite things, with the idea being that individual congregations can choose.  So, in Conservative Judaism it is completely okay to permit commitment ceremonies for gays and lesbians and to have gay and lesbian rabbis and it’s also perfectly okay not to.  I, of course, really struggle with this discrimination and lack of acceptance towards gays and lesbians, but I guess that is just one of the reasons that Conservative Judaism doesn’t work for me.  I was also very disappointed to learn that among the three responsa that got a majority vote in 2006 was one that accepts “reparative therapy” i.e. basically trying to cure people of their homosexually.  This I cannot comprehend.

The Orthodox movement naturally shows the most resistance to gays and lesbians – often completely excluding them from the Jewish community.  Jews that rely on text assert that homosexuality is not okay because in the Bible it says “do not lie with a male as one does with a woman; it is an abhorrence” (Lev. 18:22) and in Leviticus 20:13 it says the death penalty should be the punishment for a man who lies with a man.  I always find it ironic that in Leviticus 19, between the verses I just mentioned, it says you should love your neighbor as yourself.  Excluding gays and punishing them with death doesn’t seem to be loving your neighbor!

I hope the Jewish community only becomes more welcoming toward the LGBT community.  Happy Fourth of July!


Next Page »